I'm a fan of Hillary Clinton. If you've been to my site, you have seen that I support her and would love to see her get the Democratic nomination. I'm not opposed to reading criticism of dear Hillary, though. It's all fair at this point. We must consider all sides. This isn't a game anymore. This is a race to see who will become the next president. For the last 8 years we've been under an administration with a puppet behind the wheel. The next president should actually have some character and merit. The ALWAYS outspoken and over the top feminist critic and author Camille Paglia, wrote an editorial piece about Mrs. Clinton that is getting a ton of publicity. (Read it here.)
Camille says of Hillary: "Hillary's willingness to tolerate Bill's compulsive philandering is a function of her general contempt for men. She distrusts them and feels morally superior to them. Following the pattern of her long-suffering mother, she thinks it is her mission to endure every insult and personal degradation for a higher cause -- which, unlike her self-sacrificing mother, she identifies with her near-messianic personal ambition.
It's no coincidence that Hillary's staff has always consisted mostly of adoring women, with nerdy or geeky guys forming an adjunct brain trust. Hillary's rumored hostility to uniformed military men and some Secret Service agents early in the first Clinton presidency probably belongs to this pattern. And let's not forget Hillary, the governor's wife, pulling out a book and rudely reading in the bleachers during University of Arkansas football games back in Little Rock.
Hillary's disdain for masculinity fits right into the classic feminazi package, which is why Hillary acts on Gloria Steinem like catnip. Steinem's fawning, gaseous New York Times op-ed about her pal Hillary this week speaks volumes about the snobby clubbiness and reactionary sentimentality of the fossilized feminist establishment, which has blessedly fallen off the cultural map in the 21st century. History will judge Steinem and company very severely for their ethically obtuse indifference to the stream of working-class women and female subordinates whom Bill Clinton sexually harassed and abused, enabled by look-the-other-way and trash-the-victims Hillary.
How does all this affect the prospect of a Hillary presidency? With her eyes on the White House, Hillary as senator has made concerted and generally successful efforts to improve her knowledge of and relationship to the military -- crucial for any commander-in-chief but especially for the first female one. However, I remain concerned about her future conduct of high-level diplomacy. Contemptuous condescension seems to be Hillary's default mode with any male who criticizes her or stands in her way. It's a Nixonian reflex steeped in toxic gender bias. How will that play in the Muslim world?"
Camille does not stop there. It's an interesting read and definitely worth thinking about. I can't say that I agree with Camille but I've always admired how she puts her neck out there and gives hard thought to what is current and meaningful. That being said, I want Hillary to win. Despite what this highly opinionated woman has to say, I think Hillary would be a great candidate to bring change. However, in the end, I will support Obama if he does get the nomination. It's time to have a Democrat in office. Now is the time to end the eight years of Republican rule and work to regain some semblance of decency in our haggard country.
Recent Comments